Frederick Douglas and Tobias Wolff are both enslaved in their respective worlds. While Tobias is not a literal slave as Douglas is, the hardships he endures throughout the course of his childhood make him a figurative slave fighting to have control of his young life. Douglas faces a similar, yet more complicated battle to gain his freedom from a life bound to slavery. Through the course of both autobiographical texts, Douglas and Wolff struggle to gain the freedom they so desperately yearn for.
Tobias Wolff is enslaved partly due to his age and his mother’s tumultuous relationships. While it is true that most children do not have control of their lives due to a parental figure , Toby’s life is further complicated by his mother’s presence. Through her relationships with essentially abusive men, first with Roy and then with Dwight, she puts her son in less than ideal situations. Throughout the course of Toby’s young life his basic freedoms are stripped from him. In Toby’s autobiographical text he demonstrates the way in which he sought freedom from a world he hates; by creating an alternate reality. Toby is constantly making up tales and telling lies to gain freedom from the life he leads. He creates an image of the person he wants to be by developing a unrealistic world, that he does not actually live in. Toby creates a idealistic persona of himself when he writes to his pen pal, the Mickey Mouse club member, and his brother. Toby and his friend Arthur make up stories about where their families’ lineage is descended from. Because Toby feels he does not have control over his life, he simply creates the life he wishes he had. While Toby is seeking freedom from his world through lies he does not take the one real opportunity he has at freedom. Going to Paris would have been the ultimate freedom for Toby, instead he rejects the chance to go and merely continues to be enslaved in Dwight’s world. It seems that when given an opportunity for tangible freedom, Toby is too scared to leave his world behind.
Toby is ultimately rewarded for the creation of a false reality, when he is admitted to The Hill School. Toby creates a person that does not exist, but in the eyes of Hill it is a student that they are edgar to have attend their school. Hill would also be another chance for Toby to be free from the restraints of Dwight, however he has gotten to attend the school under false pretenses, which only makes him a slave to his lies.
Unlike Toby, Douglas is an actual slave, and will be bound to this position for life. Douglas expresses his autobiographical freedom through the style in which he constructs his slave narrative and his actual freedom from slavery. Without his innate intelligence and literacy, Douglas would have never gained freedom from his life bound to slavery. By becoming literate Douglas becomes hyper aware of his situation and the unjust life he is bound to. While it is the first step in his freedom, learning to read also makes Douglas despondent over his situation. However it is ultimately his literacy that allows him his autobiographical freedom.
In his autobiographical text, Douglas has control over his readers, thus fostering the sense of freedom he feels as both an author and a person. As a slave narrative, his audience is expecting a grandiose tale about his escape; however the reader is not given that. Instead Douglas expresses his freedom and decides not to give explicit details on his escape. Furthermore, his text is uncharacteristic for this time period, because of his status as a former slave. Douglas is putting his life in jeopardy, as he is an escaped and literate slave, both illegal entities at the time. This can be seen as an expression of his freedom.
Further complicating Douglas’ freedom from slavery is the lack of relief he feels after his escape. Instead of jubilation for his freedom, Douglas finds that the way of life is not much different in the North. He is at risk for capture, and must continue to tread lightly even as his autobiography gains popularity.
In conclusion, both Wolff and Douglas share similar expressions of their freedom, both in the construction of their texts and their lifestyles. While their lives may feel completely opposite there are similarities that can be drawn through their expressions of autobiographical freedom.